SLG vs SPY: SL Green Realty Corp. vs SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust Historical Returns & Investment Comparison

This SLG vs SPY comparison analyzes the historical stock performance of SL Green Realty Corp. and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust side-by-side. Using real, adjusted market data, this tool shows how identical investments in both stocks would have performed over time—highlighting differences in returns, volatility, and consistency across market cycles.

Use the interactive calculator below to adjust the investment amount and time period, visualizing how SL Green Realty Corp. and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust have historically performed against each other.

Compare Stock Performance

Select two stocks and an investment amount to see how they compare over time.

Compare any two stocks to see which performed better historically

Performance Summary

$10,000 invested from 1997 to 2025 (29 years)

Head-to-Head Record

13
SLG Wins
0
Ties
16
SPY Wins

Over the 29-year comparison period, SL Green Realty Corp. outperformed SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust in 13 years, while SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust outperformed SL Green Realty Corp. in 16 years.

SLG - SL Green Realty Corp.

Average Annual Return:+13.60%
Best Year:+109.99% (2009)
Worst Year:-70.71% (2008)
Win Rate:65.5% (19/29 years)
Total Value:$60,386.34
Total Gain:+$50,386.34 (+503.86%)

SPY - SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

Average Annual Return:+11.71%
Best Year:+37.39% (1995)
Worst Year:-36.24% (2008)
Win Rate:81.8% (27/33 years)
Total Value:$250,597.02
Total Gain:+$240,597.02 (+2405.97%)

Overall Winner: SLG with an average annual return of 13.60% (vs 11.71% for SPY)

Understanding SLG vs SPY Performance

When comparing SL Green Realty Corp. and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, investors should consider multiple factors beyond just total returns. Volatility, consistency of growth, dividend payments, and sector-specific risks all play crucial roles in determining which stock might be better suited for your investment strategy and risk tolerance.

Historical performance data shows how each stock responded to market downturns, economic expansions, and company-specific events. While past performance doesn't guarantee future results, understanding these patterns can help inform investment decisions and portfolio allocation strategies.

Cumulative Growth Comparison

A $10,000 investment in SL Green Realty Corp. grew to $60,386, compared to $250,597 for SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over the same period.

Year-by-Year Comparison

YearSLG ReturnSLG CumulativeSPY ReturnSPY CumulativeDifferenceWinner
1997 (Start)-$10,000.00-$10,000.00-Initial Investment
1998+5.81%$10,581.27+33.14%$24,261.81-27.32% (SPY)SPY
1999-11.07%$9,410.29+28.03%$31,063.11-39.10% (SPY)SPY
2000+6.17%$9,991.21+20.66%$37,482.18-14.49% (SPY)SPY
2001+37.29%$13,716.72-8.85%$34,165.23+46.14% (SLG)SLG
2002+15.87%$15,894.09-10.13%$30,703.75+26.01% (SLG)SLG
2003+9.76%$17,444.57-22.42%$23,820.14+32.17% (SLG)SLG
2004+36.37%$23,788.66+24.18%$29,580.86+12.18% (SLG)SLG
2005+53.19%$36,441.56+10.75%$32,760.13+42.44% (SLG)SLG
2006+32.31%$48,214.02+5.32%$34,504.59+26.98% (SLG)SLG
2007+74.79%$84,273.93+13.84%$39,281.03+60.95% (SLG)SLG
2008-28.17%$60,535.21+5.33%$41,375.53-33.50% (SPY)SPY
2009-70.71%$17,729.14-36.24%$26,382.38-34.48% (SPY)SPY
2010+109.99%$37,229.44+22.65%$32,359.23+87.34% (SLG)SLG
2011+38.88%$51,704.73+13.14%$36,610.39+25.74% (SLG)SLG
2012-2.85%$50,231.99+0.85%$36,922.44-3.70% (SPY)SPY
2013+14.04%$57,284.63+14.17%$42,154.69-0.13% (SPY)SPY
2014+19.78%$68,616.81+29.00%$54,380.19-9.22% (SPY)SPY
2015+31.95%$90,542.53+14.56%$62,298.86+17.39% (SLG)SLG
2016-4.82%$86,182.45+1.29%$63,101.60-6.10% (SPY)SPY
2017+0.57%$86,677.22+13.59%$71,674.43-13.01% (SPY)SPY
2018-4.12%$83,105.75+20.78%$86,569.38-24.90% (SPY)SPY
2019-18.57%$67,674.61-5.25%$82,026.91-13.32% (SPY)SPY
2020+22.98%$83,228.22+31.09%$107,527.02-8.10% (SPY)SPY
2021-26.77%$60,945.08+17.24%$126,059.55-44.01% (SPY)SPY
2022+32.21%$80,578.14+30.51%$164,514.60+1.71% (SLG)SLG
2023-53.08%$37,806.60-18.65%$133,838.54-34.43% (SPY)SPY
2024+47.06%$55,597.85+26.71%$169,585.78+20.35% (SLG)SLG
2025+55.68%$86,555.10+25.59%$212,981.61+30.09% (SLG)SLG
2026-30.23%$60,386.34+17.66%$250,597.02-47.89% (SPY)SPY

Annual returns include dividends and stock splits. Cumulative values show growth of $10,000 invested from the first year. Positive difference means SLG outperformed SPY that year.

Company Profiles

1

SL Green Realty Corp.

SLG

SL Green Realty Corp. is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (REIT) that primarily acquires, manages, and maximizes the value of Manhattan commercial properties. It is known as New York City's largest office landlord.

Key Innovations

  • One Vanderbilt development

Business Segments

  • Real Estate
    Ownership and management of office and retail buildings in NYC.
2

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

SPY

SPY is the first exchange-traded fund (ETF) listed in the US. It is designed to track the S&P 500 Index, which measures the performance of the large-cap segment of the US equity market.

Key Innovations

  • First US-listed ETF

Business Segments

  • ETF
    Passive investment vehicle tracking the S&P 500.

How This Comparison Works

Our stock comparison tool uses adjusted closing prices to calculate year-by-year returns for both stocks. This ensures an apples-to-apples comparison that accounts for:

  • Dividends: All dividend payments are reinvested
  • Stock splits: Historical prices are adjusted for all splits
  • Head-to-head record: Shows which stock outperformed each year
  • Statistical analysis: Average returns, best/worst years, and win rates

Share This Comparison

Important Disclaimer

This comparison tool is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Historical returns include dividends and stock splits but do not account for taxes, fees, inflation, or individual circumstances. Stock market investments carry risk, including the potential loss of principal. Always consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The data presented is based on historical market data and may contain inaccuracies or delays.